Once again, you simply repeat that it's a fact because you say it is and, oh some others say so too. But several people have pointed out differences. Several people have answered your assertions, and you ignore them and repeat yourself. It's tiring.

Oh, I don't know, how pathetic are the three clicks I've gotten from your directory, two of which were mine?and in an eighth of the time I've received more than 10 times that from BC. Not all sites are a good match for links from all other sites. Apparently your blogging resource site isn't very good for traffic to blogging blogs and BC isn't a very good source for traffic to celeb sites. Hmmmm... Nah, that couldn't be. Has to be that BC doesn't send anyone traffic, but just tricked my scripts into thinking they had, because they are a clone, whereas your site is a 100% original conception that sent me a hoard of magic undetectable traffic. Even the name isn't copied from a forum you used to be a moderator on.

You simply do not understand these links they are not "java", nor are they javascript. You are in point of fact, wrong. They are normal HTML link with an onclick attribute that executes some javascript when the link is clicked. Your links, on the other hand are redirects that pass nothing on to the linked site at all. I notice you skipped over an explanation for that. In reality you are doing what you accuse BC of, and they are not.

Only you could possibly draw any kind of idea that I "pretend to run the place" at BUMPzee. Apparently rationality isn't high on the priority list.

You've seen my pic. I'm not a sir, in your sarcastic sense or any other. And I've not been posting to your blog, so if your time is wasted you have yourself to thank.

But, that's okay, you're welcome to the traffic, you've paid it back in spades being an instructional instrument for people following this.