Do Bloggers Have A Contract With Their Readers?

As bloggers we want people to read what we write. And because of the personal nature of the medium of blogging, we owe some certain obligations to our readers.

I was reading through my feeds earlier, when I came across two political posts from a social media blog. I don't particularly care what the blogger's political opinions are, I read the blog for the excellent social media content. I don't really want political opinion in that reader, as it's just clutter when I'm researching and learning about the social and semantic web.

I'm not going to mention the blog here, because while I am complaining about it, it is an excellent blog, and I don't want to complain about it by name. Especially when there are many blogs doing this very thing, and there is no reason to single this blog out, other than the subject was on my mind and I hit the posts in question, so it made a good example for what I'm thinking here.

People read blogs for specific reasons. They read humor blogs to be entertained, have a fun time and a laugh or two. The read Search Engine blogs to keep up with new trends and techniques in obtaining good listings in the SERPs. They read blogging blogs to learn better blogging skills and tips and tricks for improving their blog space. They read Social media blogs to keep up with the rapidly changing landscape of social networking, and obtain best practice advice and information for making a good presentation for themselves well those networks.

Because blogging is a personal medium, and blogs are a personal publishing system, there is some flex available to inject the occasional bit of personal information into the blog.

Anyone who really enjoys a certain blog will be happy to read the occasional post about having a baby, getting married, lose teeth and even traffic frustration or project disappointment.

There are limits to these allowances, however. If your humor blog suddenly starts filling up with make money on line posts, you are going to drive your readers away. If you start posting soup recipes to your tech gadgets blog, you are going to bore your readers to tears.

If you start posting about politics or religion on any blog that isn't about those things, you run an even bigger risk. You annoy those who have no interest in those things, and you alienate those who disagree with your particular stance. Both of these results are detrimental to your blog's health.

We are operating under an unwritten contract with our readers. We all know how it is. Our feed readers and email boxes are too full as it is. So we rigorously filter them. As bloggers we have an obligation to our readers not to start dumping unrelated content into their feed readers and inboxes.

It's not fair to them. They've bookmarked us for the content we write that is in keeping with the topic our blogs are about. They subscribe to us for that specific content. We owe it to them not to start pushing out messages about things they aren't interested in.

What makes this even worse is that we have many venues for expressing ourselves on these other topics in places where people do want to read them. You can post to a forum that covers the off topic writing. You could offer your articles as guest posts to a friend with a blog on the foreign topics.

Hell, you could even start another, appropriate blog if you really have a passion about the topic. Even do a quick, "I have a new blog about ____________" post to let readers who are interested know that they can red about it there.

What do you say? is there a contract, or obligation to our readers? If not, where have I gone wrong? Do you post off topic frequently? Do you stay on message at all times? I'd love to read your thoughts.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://danemorgan.com/trackback/169
from Jesse Greenberg on Tue, 09/02/2008 - 15:56

John McCain’s surprising pick of Sarah Palin as his running mate is an excellent example of his campaign’s branding adjustment. Critics might be picking apart Palin’s credentials and commenting on McCain’s choice, but McCain...

None
Login or register to tag items
 
Posted In
Tagged With
Like this?
Bookmark & Share:
StumbleUpon Submit to Mixx Save to Google Bookmarks Save to del.icio.us
Click, Copy and Link:
<a href="http://danemorgan.com/blog/blogging/do-bloggers-have-contract-their-readers">Do Bloggers Have A Contract With Their Readers?</a>

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thanks

Good information about blogging

ikibucuk (not verified) | Tue, 12/30/2008 - 10:43

This is indeed the conventional wisdom

I think that this idea is based on common sense. Certainly, we have to be customer-focused when we write a blog. But it is also personal; and so, it should be up to the author to decide what is on topic and what is not. If you let your writing be overwhelmed by the "customer" response, measured by daily stats from Feedburner or Google Analytics, you run the risk of feeling disappointed in the short term. Blogging is a marathon, not a 100m dash.

Having said that, it is certainly important to define the boundaries so your "customer" knows what he can expect. Is it a mega-mall or a specialty organic food store? Does it solve a specific problem, or provide a wide-range of tools to fix a wide range of problems?

As a new blogger, I have the luxury of experimenting with my blog. I am still defining the boundaries.

Good luck to you all in your blogging adventure!

http://www.littlestomaks.com/about/

TwinToddlersDad (not verified) | Sun, 11/30/2008 - 23:08

ebeneara1

Good information about blogging.Its is very useful to me,i like it.

ebeneara1 (not verified) | Fri, 11/28/2008 - 04:52

I don't really mind the off-topic stuff

If there is a lot of solid on-topic content being pumped out, I don't really mind the off topic stuff. For instance, one of my favorite blogs is Shoemoney. This weekend he posted twice about Ultimate Fighting stuff. Not the least bit on topic, but it adds a little spice. Its sort of like having a color commentator on a sports broadcast.

Kyle Howard (not verified) | Tue, 11/18/2008 - 01:04

It Could Work

The only way a blog can get away with writing off topic is if they find a concrete way to link it to their main topic. For example, if you write a blog on freelancing, then when you talk about the presidential candidates, it better be related to something they are doing that will effect freelancers. "The President will Tax Freelancers out of Business" or something like that would work.

Great post though, I agree completely.

Levi Blackman (not verified) | Sat, 11/01/2008 - 15:56

When I'm writing im my blog

When I'm writing im my blog i put in mind that someone will read that, but i write what i want without any commitment about what readers would think because it's my blog...hahaha

Michael (not verified) | Thu, 09/18/2008 - 10:12

I would never read a blog

I would never read a blog again if it diverted from its niche. However, sometimes readers do ask to expand what I write on. I write about conflict and Human Rights etc. in my region and am concentrating on it, sometime though readers do want me to analyse other conflicts and write on them too (e.g. Iraq war) but I can't do that and won't do that because I do not believe in being a desktop blogger, I need to know first hand to write. So, what does one do in such a case? Does one start blogging about similar topics?

K (not verified) | Fri, 09/12/2008 - 12:28

Yep, there are limits!

I believe each blog that claims to belong to a specific niche, should do its best to respect that niche. Like you, I don't subscribe to MM blogs to read about the author's vacation in Paris. I don't like getting into religious debates on computer hacks blogs (I swear, it happened!).
So yes, you draw lines for yourself to respect on your blog, and you do disappoint your readers when you overstep the borders.

SEO Toronto (not verified) | Mon, 09/08/2008 - 15:47

Thanks for your input!

I appreciate you taking the time to weigh in on this.

Yes, and you aren't even close to alone. I think a lot of bloggers just don't realize how high the annoyance factor is for those folks your used to read their blogs when they do this.

Dane Morgan | Mon, 09/08/2008 - 22:34

You mean there is more then just me reading my blog? Yikes! :)

I agree with what you are saying in this post! I blog about where I live, which has a large variety of subjects from wildlife to extreme weather conditions, plus it has a lot of other things going on that interests the world, pipelines, politicians, etc.

But if I started blogging about a completely different area of the world or devoted it to humor, or self-diagnosis, then I can see my readers feeling a little put off by it.

Great post, and a great reminder that there is more then just me out there reading my stuff..well...er... I hope there is anyways...
Thank-you!

K. Fields (not verified) | Thu, 09/04/2008 - 02:31

here's Hoping you have a bunch of readers...

I sure hope you're not the only one reading your blog. But if you are stick around, and ask questions. We'll try to fix that for ya! :)

Dane Morgan | Mon, 09/08/2008 - 22:29

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Restrict text by wrapping in [restrict:roles=<comma separated roles>] and [/restrict]
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • Highlight terms in this textarea.
  • You can enable syntax highlighting of source code with the following tags: <code>, <blockcode>. Beside the tag style "<foo>" it is also possible to use "[foo]".
  • Use <fn>...</fn> to insert automatically numbered footnotes.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Please fill out this captcha to demonstrate your humanity.
2 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.